Digital Interventions to Interrupt Hate Online: The Work of Moonshot
Moonshot is a global social enterprise working to end online harms, applying evidence, ethics, and human rights to this endeavor.
Researching the Causes of Radicalization and Violent Extremism: What Do We Know?
Peer-reviewed research on radicalization and violent extremism identifies a “basic structure of the process of radicalization” where an individual has “real or perceived political grievance(s),” perceives participation in violent extremism as somehow appealing or beneficial, and has a “personal vulnerability” expressed as certain personality traits or a mental health concern.
Special Issue: Countering Hate and Violent Extremism
We are pleased to present our special issue on countering hate and violent extremism in collaboration with Thought Partnerships.
Everyday Racism and Violence in Brazil’s Favelas
Racism has a significant impact on favela residents’ daily lives, visibly through police killings but also invisibly through everyday interactions of discrimination and distrust.
Which Women’s Rights? Exploring Gender and Peace in Afghanistan
Rural villagers understood girls’ access to education and women’s economic opportunities outside the home as indicators of everyday peace.
Creating the “Problem of Extremism”
The turn from the GWOT to CVE, with its focus on prevention, broadened the monitoring mandate of security agencies, enabling them to apply tactics based on the assumption that anyone (but mostly the most traditionally marginalized) can be a potential “terrorist” or “extremist,” thereby justifying surveillance, intelligence gathering, and other civil rights violations of so-called suspects.
The Human Experience of Counterterrorism in the Global War on Terror (GWOT)
Violence prevention policy-making must start from an understanding of the lived experience of communities most affected by the GWOT in order to not be complicit in harmful and structurally racist policies.
How Successful Was the Global War on Terror? Evidence of a Backlash Effect
The backlash of retaliatory transnational terrorist attacks experienced by coalition countries demonstrates the Global War on Terror did not meet its key objective of keeping citizens safe from terrorism.
How International Law Facilitates the Bombing of Civilians in the U.S. War on Terror
The Obama Administration constructed the concept of frontier territories—areas that are out of state control but fall within a state’s territorial boundaries—to “sidestep legal constraints” in the use of military force and “cover up what many would consider extra-legal behavior” in U.S. drone warfare.
Militarization Through Civilian National Security Neglect
In Brazil, civilian authorities failed to advance a comprehensive national security policy and deferred to the military in the areas of intelligence, public safety, and border control—which help to maintain military priorities in the security sector and expand the military’s role in public life.
How Security Discourses Shape Responses to Environmental Insecurity
Whether and how issues—including environmental issues—are “securitized” (framed and understood as security concerns) matters for how these are subsequently addressed, especially since naming something as a security concern tends to demand urgent action.
