Patrick Hiller, Executive Director of the War Prevention Initiative, attended a retreat by the Jubitz Family Foundation where current key environmental areas (e.g. forests, water, climate change) were discussed. The insightful discussions demonstrated that seemingly disconnected topics such as forests/water and war prevention are situated in the larger context of destructive systems which need to be transformed to constructive ones.
The War Prevention Initiative in collaboration with Ploughshares Fund, Win Without War and the University of Oregon hosted an informative and inspiring conversation around the theme of national security in turbulent times.
Michelle Dover from Ploughshares Fund emphasized the need to view domestic and foreign policy as a whole, not as issue areas that can be separated. Stephen Miles from Win Without War reminded the audience of the importance to weigh into the political issues regardless of where people are located. Instead of waiting to hear perspectives from D.C., he argued it was important for the people in D.C. to listen to voices outside.
The conversation was moderated by Patrick Hiller of the War Prevention Initiative.
Win Without War is a diverse network of activists and organizations working for a more peaceful, progressive US foreign policy.
“There is no reason to go to war with Iran. One of the problems we have with the narrative is that even those who are pro diplomacy supporters still do that in a paradigm of the good ‘us’ versus the bad ‘them’…. We need to get beyond that narrative and figure out how to improve relations between the countries.”
War Prevention Initiative Executive Director Patrick Hiller addressed a town hall meeting convened by Congressman Earl Blumenauer on June 15, 2019. The American Iranian Friendship Council and Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility sponsored the event. In his prepared remarks, Hiller emphasized the importance of changing the narrative around Iran and its people to ensure that the constant dehumanization of a country of 80 million people ends. He also emphasized the important role of Congress to prevent military action of any type and seek diplomatic pathways in the current crisis between the US and Iran.
Click the link bellow to see a brief interview on the news program:
For immediate release; February 24, 2019; Portland, Oregon
Contacts: In Washington, DC, Lily Tajaddini, 240-498-4218, lily[at]codepink.org
In Tehran, Medea Benjamin +001-415-235-6517, medea.benjamin[at]gmail.com
A CODEPINK delegation of 30 Americans will be traveling to Iran from February 25-March 6 to express their deep concern to the Iranian people about the effect of the Trump administration’s brutal sanctions, abrogation of the Nuclear Agreement and building a case for war. The delegation is composed of lawyers, journalists, physicians, activists, artists, and other professionals who hope to help move our two nations from a place of hostility and military threats to a place of mutual respect and peace. Delegates will be meeting Iranian academics, students, artists, religious leaders and parliamentarians.
The group will be traveling to Iran just at the time when the Trump administration has been ramping up its opposition to the Iranian government. It organized an anti-Iran gathering in Poland on February 13-14, chastised the Europeans for not joining US-imposed sanctions, and increased its support for fringe opposition groups such as the MEK and royalists.
“Americans should challenge policies of our country that are wrong and harm others,” said retired US Army Colonel and former US diplomat Ann Wright. “The Trump administration’s abrogation of the nuclear agreement and the increased sanctions on Iran are harmful and dangerous, which is why our people-to-people delegation is so important.”
“We are anxious to see firsthand how the sweeping US sanctions are affecting ordinary Iranians so we can come back and convey their stories,” said CODEPINK cofounder Medea Benjamin. “Of course there are tensions between the governments. That makes it more important that we come as good listeners and with the clear message that we don’t want war. There is no reason why we as Americans cannot live in peace with the Iranian people,” said War Prevention Initiative Executive Director, Patrick Hiller.
Please contact Patrick Hiller, War Prevention Initiative’s Executive Director at firstname.lastname@example.org or 503 505-5721 (phone upon return) who has joined the delegtation from Oregon for articles, blogs and speaking engagements.
The War Prevention Initiative was honored to co-host Nobel Peace Laureate Tilman Ruff from the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons. As members of this international civil society campaign, it was a privilege to meet and listen to one of campaign’s co-founders. Ruff gave a talk entitled Before They End Us: The New Global Movement to End Nuclear Weapons and Protect Planetary Health, a discussion about nuclear weapons and the nuclear disarmament movement. Read more
The War Prevention Initiative Team enjoyed participating in the 2018 Global PDX Conference. At a gathering, aimed at exploring the humanitarian-development-peace nexus, War Prevention Initiative Executive Director Patrick Hiller gave the opening keynote speech entitled: The humanitarian-development-peace nexus: multidimensional responses to multidimensional problems.
Recognizing the many positive opportunities, Hiller suggested that business as usual was not an option and that if we concentrate on helping and forget to criticize the root causes, we are to a certain degree legitimizing those.
The War Prevention Initiative gladly endorsed the “Back from the Brink” initiative.
In light of ongoing efforts to secure lasting peace and denuclearization on the Korean Peninsula, civil society groups and leaders from the Korea Peace Network sent this letter to President Trump to lay out concrete steps we believe the administration should take to advance the diplomatic process with North Korea.
President Donald Trump
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20500
August 2, 2018
Re: Implementing the Joint Statement of the Singapore Summit
Dear Mr. President:
As concerned U.S. civil society groups and individuals working for peace, disarmament and development projects in Korea, we urge you to continue to pursue a “maximum engagement” policy with the DPRK (North Korea), and not return to the dangerous and counter-productive “maximum pressure” campaign that some misguided hardliners advocate.
First, we congratulate you for holding the historic U.S.-DPRK Summit with Chairman Kim Jong Un in Singapore on June 12 and thank you for your decision to suspend the large-scale U.S.-ROK joint war drills that have provoked North Korea for decades.
Unlike some critics, we are pleased with the Summit’s Joint Statement which provides an excellent framework to achieve both a peace regime and nuclear disarmament on the Korean Peninsula. In particular, we appreciate your commitment to establishing “new U.S.-DPRK relations,” building “a lasting and stable peace regime on the Korean Peninsula,” and providing “security guarantees to the DPRK” since such measures are essential to realizing a peaceful “denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.”
Unfortunately, recent news reports of official statements indicate that there was a serious misunderstanding between the U.S. and the DPRK regarding the process for achieving the Joint Statement’s main objectives. It seems that some U.S. officials expect the DPRK to achieve rapid, unilateral nuclear disarmament first, before the two sides have established a foundation of mutual trust and reciprocity, or before the U.S. has provided substantial “security guarantees to the DPRK” in return for its concessions. We believe this expectation is a critical mistake and may result in the U.S. repeating past failures to implement U.S.-DPRK agreements.
In the hope that the Joint Statement can be carried out successfully, we recommend that the U.S. take the following steps going forward:
1) Instead of insisting that the DPRK take major denuclearization steps from the start, initiate a series of confidence-building measures first, such as resuming the joint search and recovery operations for the U.S. soldiers’ remains in North Korea that were suspended by the U.S. in 2005; encouraging people-to-people exchanges by removing the draconian U.S. travel bans that not only prevent our people visiting North Korea but also North Koreans visiting the U.S.; removing the designation of DPRK as a state sponsor of terrorism; and lifting the U.S./UN economic sanctions that undermine the general health and welfare of the North Korean people. Recent news indicates that about 10 million people in North Korea “are undernourished” and that the current sanctions endanger the lives of vulnerable people by making it difficult for drugs and supplies, as well as donated funds, to be brought into the country.
2) Prioritize ending the existing state of war in Korea. In observance of the 65th anniversary of the signing of the Armistice Agreement in July 1953, organize a second major summit in 2018 to include leaders of the U.S., DPRK, ROK (South Korea), and China. The purpose of this summit would be to issue a Joint Declaration to finally end the Korean War by replacing the Armistice Agreement with a lasting Peace Treaty.
3) Appoint a Special Envoy to handle the negotiations for mutual nuclear disarmament on the Korean Peninsula, the normalization of U.S.-DPRK relations, and the Peace Treaty. Excellent candidates for a U.S. Special Envoy would include the distinguished former U.S. Ambassadors Donald Gregg, James Laney, and Kathleen Stephens, all of whom are experts on Korea affairs.
4) To provide the security assurances and expedite the desired denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, announce a new U.S. policy of “no first use of nuclear weapons” and “no first military strike” against the DPRK; remove all U.S. nuclear assets and personnel from the region, including Japan; and commence a gradual reduction of the 32,000 U.S. military personnel in South Korea.
5) Respect the Panmunjom Declaration for Peace, Prosperity and Unification of Korea adopted at the Inter-Korean Summit on April 27, 2018. The U.S. should encourage and support the reconciliation, mutual cooperation, and self-determination of the Korean people; and, as soon as possible, transfer the wartime U.S. military command and control of the ROK military back to the ROK Government.
We believe that these measures taken by the U.S. would lead to a high level of mutual trust and confidence so that the Joint Statement could be implemented successfully. We trust that you will continue to strive to establish a new chapter in U.S.-DPRK relations. There may be many bumps in the road ahead, but we are confident that you can overcome the obstacles by making progress step-by-step, with patience, and in good faith.
Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned if you have any questions regarding our recommendations, or if we can be of a help to you in any way.
Civil Society Groups
Action for One Korea (CA)
Campaign for Peace, Disarmament and Common Security (MA)
Chicago Area Peace Action
Phyllis Bennis, Institute for Policy Studies – New Internationalism Project (DC)
Rev. Kilsang Yoon, President, Korean American National Coordinating Council (NY)
Judith Arnold, President, New Jersey Peace Action
Nuclear Age Peace Foundation (CA)
Peace Action Maine
Jim Anderson, President, Peace Action New York State
David Hartsough, Executive Director, Peaceworkers (CA)
PeaceWorks of Greater Brunswick (MA)
Earl Arnold, Co-Convener, Presbyterian Peace Network for Korea
Rev. Tong-Kyun Kim, The Least of These Church, NYC
Dr. Susan Henry-Crowe, General Secretary, General Board of Church and Society, The United Methodist Church
Terry Rockeller & Jackie Cabasso, National Co-conveners, United for Peace and Justice (NY)
U.S. Peace Council (CT)
Gerry Condon, President, Veterans For Peace (MO)
Veterans For Peace – Chapter 69 (San Francisco)
Veterans For Peace – Chapter 109 (Olympia, Washington)
Veterans For Peace – Chapter 162 (East Bay, CA)
Patrick Hiller, Executive Director, War Prevention Initiative (OR)
Jacqueline Cabasso, Executive Director, Western States Legal Foundation (CA)
Women Cross DMZ
Gwyn Kirk & Deborah Lee, Co-Chairs, Women for Genuine Security (CA)
World Beyond War
Individuals (in alphabetical order; organization is for identification only)
Medea Benjamin, Codepink
Rev. Dr. Ignacio Castuera, President, Religion-Online.org
Rev. We Hyun Chang, District Superintendent, Metro Boston Hope District, United Methodist Church
Noam Chomsky, Institute Professor Emeritus, MIT; Laureate Professor, University of Arizona
Aiyoung Choi, Women Cross DMZ
Marjorie Cohn, Prof. Emerita, Thomas Jefferson School of Law
Hassan El-Tayyab, Policy and Organizing Director, Chicago Area Peace Action
Joseph Essertier, Professor of English, Nagoya Institute of Technology
Rev. Dr. Heecheon Jeon, Conference Superintendent, Central District Iowa Annual Conference, United Methodist Church
Nan Kim, Women Cross DMZ, & Presbyterian Peace Network for Korea
Peter Kuznick, Professor of History and Director, Nuclear Studies Institute, American University
Rev. Gene Matthews, United Methodist Missionary to Korea, 1956-1997
Rev. Dr. George Ogle, United Methodist Missionary to Korea, 1954-1974
Dorothy Ogle, United Methodist Missionary to Korea, 1960-1975
Margo Okazawa-Rey, Barbara Lee Distinguished Chair in Women’s Leadership, Mills College; Professor Emerita, San Francisco University
Alice Slater, World Beyond War
Lawrence Wittner, Professor of History Emeritus, SUNY/Albany
Michael Wong, Veterans For Peace – Chapter 69 (San Francisco)
The Handbook of Research on Promoting Peace Through Practice, Academia, and the Arts (published September 2018) includes a chapter written by War Prevention Initiative team members David Prater and Patrick Hiller. It is titled Recognizing the Science of Peace to Build Positive Peace. Included in our chapter is original research and commentary highlighting the importance of often-overlooked theories and guiding principles from the academic field of peace and conflict research. We introduce readers to peace science, the discipline examining the causes of war and conditions for peace, and how it can help bridge the gap between peace movement moralism and pragmatism.
Inside the chapter, we discuss the research-practice communication gap as a strong impediment to making peace science relevant and useful. Communication barriers, the requirements of academic publishing, and the lack of public relevance for academia are also examined. Examples of often under-recognized peace research contributions are presented within the framework of the Global Peace System. In doing so, the potential and actual relevance of those research contributions to real-world peace and justice issues is emphasized. We argue for the necessity of peace researchers making conscious efforts to contribute to peacebuilding practices, public discourse and attempt to reach audiences beyond the academic community.
Prater, D. E., & Hiller, P. T. (2018). Recognizing the Science of Peace to Build Positive Peace. In M. W. Lutfy & C. Toffolo (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Promoting Peace Through Practice, Academia, and the Arts (pp. 19–42). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.